gc_check
11-26 06:47 PM
Yes, the number will be the same.
Just want to confirm if both needs to be surrendered
Just want to confirm if both needs to be surrendered
wallpaper Comedian Jerry Seinfeld and
Berkeleybee
04-06 11:25 AM
It was my understanding that in the current context when people say "Hagel bill" they are talking about the "Hagel-Martinez" compromise on guest worker legalization, not the entire old Hagel bill.
See http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/05/immigration/index.html
Is there any concrete article/source that suggests this is not the case?
Berkeleybee
See http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/05/immigration/index.html
Is there any concrete article/source that suggests this is not the case?
Berkeleybee
rhlsur
05-06 08:23 PM
I'm facing a frustrating issue and am hoping that someone can provide help on this. I'm on my H1 10th year extn. My I-140 (EB-3) was recently approved and I cannot apply for I-485 as the visa dates are not available. My Company recently changed their name from ABC, doing business as XYZ, to DEF, doing business as XYZ (the doing business as part of the name is the same and there was no merger, just a name change).
My first question is does this invalidate my approved I-140 and should I refile the I-140. Also, when I file my H-1 extension what document should I provide to prove the name change (or is it even needed?)? Any help on these 2 questions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
My first question is does this invalidate my approved I-140 and should I refile the I-140. Also, when I file my H-1 extension what document should I provide to prove the name change (or is it even needed?)? Any help on these 2 questions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
2011 2010 by Jerry Seinfeld#39;s
ivar27
11-08 12:28 PM
Thanks for quick response.
I still do not know wat is query is. My employer hasnt received the details of query yet.
looking at the worst side, wat if the H1 tranfer Denied/rejected. Can i ask Company D to file for a new H1?
I still do not know wat is query is. My employer hasnt received the details of query yet.
looking at the worst side, wat if the H1 tranfer Denied/rejected. Can i ask Company D to file for a new H1?
more...
number30
05-15 10:51 AM
Are they also getting new I-94 every time...:confused:
I forgot that. they Do not need new I-94 every time. But I remember We were asked to put all Entry to Canada on I485 papers . I use to go Toranto Every week at that time.
I forgot that. they Do not need new I-94 every time. But I remember We were asked to put all Entry to Canada on I485 papers . I use to go Toranto Every week at that time.
smuggymba
12-18 08:31 AM
Cap on skilled immigration unlawful: UK court - World News - IBNLive (http://ibnlive.in.com/news/cap-on-skilled-immigration-unlawful-uk-court/137822-2.html?from=tn)
London: A temporary cap on the number of skilled workers from India and other countries outside the European Union was introduced in June 'unlawfully', the High Court ruled on Friday.
Home Secretary Theresa May had introduced the cap as an interim measure before a permanent cap to be in place from April 2011. It was challenged on the ground that ministers had 'sidestepped' parliamentary scrutiny before announcing the
temporary cap.
The legal challenge to the cap of 24,100 until April 2011 was brought by the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) and English Community Care Association, and was upheld by judges on Friday.
The Home Office said this did not imperil its flagship immigration policy but the opposition Labour said the police it was in "chaos" after the court ruling.
The ruling has nullified the current temporary cap, meaning it is no longer in force.
The cap was one of the first measures of the coalition government that promised to bring down immigrations from hundreds of thousands every year to 'tens of thousands.
In today's ruling, Lord Justice Sullivan and Justice Burton concluded that the home secretary had not gone through the proper parliamentary procedures before implementing the cap, which took effect without a vote in Parliament.
The judges said: "The secretary of state made no secret of her intentions. There can be no doubt that she was attempting to side-step provisions for Parliamentary scrutiny set up under provisions of the 1971 Immigration Act and her attempt was for that reason unlawful." As a result, it said no lawful limits were now in place for Tier One and Tier Two applicants from abroad. The Home Office said it was still "firmly committed" to reducing levels of net migration. "I am disappointed with today's verdict," Immigration minister Damian Green said, adding: "We will do all in our power to continue to prevent a rush of applications before our more permanent measures are in place".
London: A temporary cap on the number of skilled workers from India and other countries outside the European Union was introduced in June 'unlawfully', the High Court ruled on Friday.
Home Secretary Theresa May had introduced the cap as an interim measure before a permanent cap to be in place from April 2011. It was challenged on the ground that ministers had 'sidestepped' parliamentary scrutiny before announcing the
temporary cap.
The legal challenge to the cap of 24,100 until April 2011 was brought by the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) and English Community Care Association, and was upheld by judges on Friday.
The Home Office said this did not imperil its flagship immigration policy but the opposition Labour said the police it was in "chaos" after the court ruling.
The ruling has nullified the current temporary cap, meaning it is no longer in force.
The cap was one of the first measures of the coalition government that promised to bring down immigrations from hundreds of thousands every year to 'tens of thousands.
In today's ruling, Lord Justice Sullivan and Justice Burton concluded that the home secretary had not gone through the proper parliamentary procedures before implementing the cap, which took effect without a vote in Parliament.
The judges said: "The secretary of state made no secret of her intentions. There can be no doubt that she was attempting to side-step provisions for Parliamentary scrutiny set up under provisions of the 1971 Immigration Act and her attempt was for that reason unlawful." As a result, it said no lawful limits were now in place for Tier One and Tier Two applicants from abroad. The Home Office said it was still "firmly committed" to reducing levels of net migration. "I am disappointed with today's verdict," Immigration minister Damian Green said, adding: "We will do all in our power to continue to prevent a rush of applications before our more permanent measures are in place".
more...
morchu
05-24 01:25 AM
SSN is not really a requirement to start to work. So the answer to your question is NO, she dont need SSN to work on EAD.
But in a practical scenario she need an SSN to work (see below reasons).
SSN is required to pay/withhold taxes and probably for pre-employment background checks and all. So it is very unlikely that an employer will hire somebody without an SSN (or at-least applied for SSN).
Does she need SSN to work on EAD?
But in a practical scenario she need an SSN to work (see below reasons).
SSN is required to pay/withhold taxes and probably for pre-employment background checks and all. So it is very unlikely that an employer will hire somebody without an SSN (or at-least applied for SSN).
Does she need SSN to work on EAD?
2010 images Jerry Seinfeld seems to
pappu
01-01 06:31 PM
IV has been featured in India Post newspaper.
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=40338#post40338
Could someone send me the scanned copy of the article? I would post it on the site for everyone to see and also record it for our purposes.
himanshu at immigrationvoice.org
thanks
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?p=40338#post40338
Could someone send me the scanned copy of the article? I would post it on the site for everyone to see and also record it for our purposes.
himanshu at immigrationvoice.org
thanks
more...
jonty_11
06-25 05:35 PM
Didnt they just abolish labor substitution?????
hair Jerry Seinfeld#39;s wife,
Blog Feeds
08-12 09:50 AM
I recently received an inquiry at my San Francisco immigration law office from an "employer" who recently discovered that a person whom he had hired as an independent contractor was in the United States illegally. The employer had not originally known that the "employee" was illegal because independent contractors are exempt from the requirements of the Immigration Reform and Control Act (*IRCA*) (https://www.oig.lsc.gov/legis/irca86.htm) that require an employer to verify that an an employee is authorized to work in the United States. The "employer" wanted to explore the options of legalizing the contractor. While thinking about the options, I became interested in how the law defines an independent contractor.
According to 8 Code of Federal Regulations Section 274a.1(j) (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/8cfr274a.1.pdf) an independent contractor is an individual or entity who carries on an independent business, contracts to do a piece of work according to their own means and methods, and are subject to control only as to results.
The decision of whether or not someone is an independent contractor is determined on a case-by-case basis. Factors to be considered include whether the individual or entity:
supplies the tools or materials;
makes services available to the general public;
works for a number of clients at the same time;
has an opportunity for profit or loss as a result of labor or services provided;
invests in the facilities for work;
directs the order or sequence in which the work is to be done and determines the hours during which the work is to be done.
I began to wonder if people used independent contractors to get around the IRCA requirements. Apparently Congress thought about that as there is a regulation which states that an "employer" may not avoid the requirements of IRCA by hiring an independent contractor if a person or entity knowingly uses a contract or subcontract to obtain labor or services of an unauthorized alien. 8 C.F.R. �274a.5 (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/8cfr274a.5.pdf).
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/08/there_will_always_be_illegal_w.html)
According to 8 Code of Federal Regulations Section 274a.1(j) (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/8cfr274a.1.pdf) an independent contractor is an individual or entity who carries on an independent business, contracts to do a piece of work according to their own means and methods, and are subject to control only as to results.
The decision of whether or not someone is an independent contractor is determined on a case-by-case basis. Factors to be considered include whether the individual or entity:
supplies the tools or materials;
makes services available to the general public;
works for a number of clients at the same time;
has an opportunity for profit or loss as a result of labor or services provided;
invests in the facilities for work;
directs the order or sequence in which the work is to be done and determines the hours during which the work is to be done.
I began to wonder if people used independent contractors to get around the IRCA requirements. Apparently Congress thought about that as there is a regulation which states that an "employer" may not avoid the requirements of IRCA by hiring an independent contractor if a person or entity knowingly uses a contract or subcontract to obtain labor or services of an unauthorized alien. 8 C.F.R. �274a.5 (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/8cfr274a.5.pdf).
More... (http://www.californiaimmigrationlawyerblog.com/2009/08/there_will_always_be_illegal_w.html)
more...
coolgc
05-14 09:42 AM
Hi,
My PD is 2006 under EB-2 category. My family and I filed for GC on the same day. Now, I am planning to file a new I-140 under EB1. My kid is going to be 18 soon. What is the age limit for dependent to file for GC with the parents?
Your reply is greatly appreciated.
Thank you!
My PD is 2006 under EB-2 category. My family and I filed for GC on the same day. Now, I am planning to file a new I-140 under EB1. My kid is going to be 18 soon. What is the age limit for dependent to file for GC with the parents?
Your reply is greatly appreciated.
Thank you!
hot Jessica Seinfeld Could Have
gc_user
11-28 08:29 AM
Any updates please????
more...
house dresses Jerry Seinfeld will
JohnGalt08
02-20 08:19 PM
this is not consistent. I just booked appt for my in laws yesterday 54 year old but did not get 157 pop up just 156. hope this helps.
you can log in to the vfs website and see if a DS157 is available for filling in. If yes, then just fill it out and print it.
you can log in to the vfs website and see if a DS157 is available for filling in. If yes, then just fill it out and print it.
tattoo (L-R) Jerry Seinfeld, wife
krupa
07-10 02:48 PM
Visa Bulletin
Number 108
Volume IX
Washington, D.C.
The Visa Bulletin for July 2007, posted on June 12, must be read in conjunction with the Update of July Visa Availability, posted on July 2.
The Update of July Visa Availability, posted on July 2, must be read in conjunction with the Visa Bulletin for July 2007, which was posted on June 12.
In put by Krupa:
=============
Why DOS issued the above mentioned new bulletin on 9th July 2007 ?
What is the legal implications before and after issuing this bulletin ?
Any one can update this thread please?
Number 108
Volume IX
Washington, D.C.
The Visa Bulletin for July 2007, posted on June 12, must be read in conjunction with the Update of July Visa Availability, posted on July 2.
The Update of July Visa Availability, posted on July 2, must be read in conjunction with the Visa Bulletin for July 2007, which was posted on June 12.
In put by Krupa:
=============
Why DOS issued the above mentioned new bulletin on 9th July 2007 ?
What is the legal implications before and after issuing this bulletin ?
Any one can update this thread please?
more...
pictures (Jerry Seinfeld#39;s wife!)
pa_arora
02-25 05:11 PM
check this out..
http://www.murthy.com/news/n_firule.html
http://www.murthy.com/news/n_firule.html
dresses wife jerry seinfeld kids.
meridiani.planum
04-07 12:16 PM
How long will it take to get a green card in this category with a PD in 2008?
Will it be better to find another Job and go EB2? My H1b started in Oct 2007.
If you qualify for EB2 then obviously go for EB2 (as its current). If you dont have a masters and have only say 2 years of experience, then instead of wasting 3 years waiting for EB2, start a GC in EB3. Once you get past I-140 the PD becomes yours. Now whenever you jump jobs and file GC again (in EB2 say) you will get the 2008 PD. So even if EB2 retrogresses in the future, you would have saved yourplace in ht equeue.
Will it be better to find another Job and go EB2? My H1b started in Oct 2007.
If you qualify for EB2 then obviously go for EB2 (as its current). If you dont have a masters and have only say 2 years of experience, then instead of wasting 3 years waiting for EB2, start a GC in EB3. Once you get past I-140 the PD becomes yours. Now whenever you jump jobs and file GC again (in EB2 say) you will get the 2008 PD. So even if EB2 retrogresses in the future, you would have saved yourplace in ht equeue.
more...
makeup Jerry Seinfeld with his wife
willigetagc
11-13 05:33 AM
I am sure this may have been asked already but I coudn't find a thread.
I have an approved and valid extension on my H1 but my EAD expired in august and my AP expired last month. I didn't file for an EAD/AP renewal yet because I was not using them and wanted to delay it for a few months and save some money.
Will there be any problem with a delayed EAD/AP filing ?
I have an approved and valid extension on my H1 but my EAD expired in august and my AP expired last month. I didn't file for an EAD/AP renewal yet because I was not using them and wanted to delay it for a few months and save some money.
Will there be any problem with a delayed EAD/AP filing ?
girlfriend Jessica Seinfeld, wife
waiting4gc02
02-20 09:11 AM
Thanks for the response.
One more thing, so when I join Company B and they file for a new H1-B for me and also LC under EB-2, I should be able to use the experience that I had with Company A..???? Is this right..?
Thanks again.
One more thing, so when I join Company B and they file for a new H1-B for me and also LC under EB-2, I should be able to use the experience that I had with Company A..???? Is this right..?
Thanks again.
hairstyles Jerry Seinfeld#39;s wife
jonty_11
04-11 03:03 PM
USCIS is the US Govt..You do not tell Uncle SAm how to do their job....!!
vin13
05-28 12:47 PM
IVians,
Wondering if anyone on this forum at had applied for unemployment benefits in the state PA. My wife who has a dependent AOS pending wnats to file the claim and see if it gets approved.
on PA state Govt. website, it is asking for the Alien registration number(A#?) if the person is not a US citizen.Is it o.k to provide the A# ?? Also, since my spouse worked on 1099-Misc for a while,we don't think they are going to accept our Applictaion to provide unemployment benefits. But we just gonna try and see...
Please advise?
Have you done any homework before asking these questions? Have you called the unemployment office to inquire about her eligibility?
To answer your question,
Yes, it is OK to provide A#. Without the A# they will not be able to check on her immigration status.
You would qualify for Unemployment in PA as long as there is a pending green card application.
Offcourse the applicant should have earned income in the previous year to qualify.
I would highly advise you to contact the unemployement office in your local city and explain your situation and get their advise.
Wondering if anyone on this forum at had applied for unemployment benefits in the state PA. My wife who has a dependent AOS pending wnats to file the claim and see if it gets approved.
on PA state Govt. website, it is asking for the Alien registration number(A#?) if the person is not a US citizen.Is it o.k to provide the A# ?? Also, since my spouse worked on 1099-Misc for a while,we don't think they are going to accept our Applictaion to provide unemployment benefits. But we just gonna try and see...
Please advise?
Have you done any homework before asking these questions? Have you called the unemployment office to inquire about her eligibility?
To answer your question,
Yes, it is OK to provide A#. Without the A# they will not be able to check on her immigration status.
You would qualify for Unemployment in PA as long as there is a pending green card application.
Offcourse the applicant should have earned income in the previous year to qualify.
I would highly advise you to contact the unemployement office in your local city and explain your situation and get their advise.
sw33t
07-30 12:07 PM
23 members and counting.
Have you signed up yet?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/texasiv
Have you signed up yet?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/texasiv
No comments:
Post a Comment